by 
Among all the personal details we voluntarily surrender to social media platforms, usernames uniquely tie our activities and posts across sites to a single identity. Most assume anonymous handles afford some privacy. However, thanks to the powerful cross-referencing capabilities of a Python tool called Sherlock, those expectations can be deeply misplaced.
Hunt Down Users with Sherlock
Sherlock is an open-source command-line tool that allows probing social networks for username validity across over 100 sites. By using Python to automate custom platform queries, Sherlock can expose if the same username is tied to an individual’s profile across various apps. This enables grouping supposed anonymous accounts to a single identifiable online personality at scale through username cross-referencing.
We walk through Sherlock’s methodology, showcase revealing sample searches, weigh use cases from marketing to investigations and discuss critical privacy implications that subvert expectations of anonymity provided by usernames and handles across social media.
For cybersecurity researchers, marketeers and social engineers, Sherlock also represents an attractive open source intelligence tool for reconnaissance assignments. However, we also strongly examine the legal and ethical concerns of operating such a socially invasive utility. Either ways, Sherlock opens another front in the data privacy wars power users should be aware of.
Installation
Clone the repo of Sherlock Tool from GitHub
git clone https://github.com/sherlock-project/sherlock.gitChange the working directory to sherlock
cd sherlockInstall the requirements
python3 -m pip install -r requirements.txtUsage
python3 sherlock --help
To search for only one user:
python3 sherlock user123To search for more than one user:
python3 sherlock user1 user2 user3Accounts found will be stored in an individual text file with the corresponding username (e.g user123.txt).
How Cyber Investigators Leverage Sherlock for Tracking Targets on Social Media
Sherlock delivers unsettling effectiveness in linking usernames to individual identities across social platforms in direct contradiction to perceived anonymity. While powerful for gathering open source intelligence, clear legal and ethical boundaries apply for operating such as tool.
What users post pseudonymously on niche hobby forums can get mapped back to primary social profiles and real personas using Sherlock’s methodology. This carries serious privacy implications while also destroying notions of reliable anonymity afforded by handles and aliases.
Beyond OSINT uses by security professionals, the same set of techniques when improperly applied enable dangerous stalking capabilities. Users must thoughtfully weigh necessity and proportionality principles before deploying Sherlock recreationally.
Moreover, social platforms now must counter rising username searchability with better infrastructure safeguards across internally siloed products. Relying solely on password protection of singular accounts is clearly inadequate given cross-referencing vulnerabilities.
In many ways, Sherlock represents the opening salvo in the emerging brand impersonation style of data thefts aiming to manipulate the trust authentic personalities command. As people depend more on ephemeral digital relationships, preserving anonymity requires rethinking tools, policies and behaviors around conscious data sharing.
